Many times, the most critical issue in a drug case is not the jury trial but the suppression issues. Drug cases almost always involve searches and seizures in one way or another. Under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 2, Section 7 of the Colorado Constitution, all people have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. But what does that mean? No two cases are the same. There have been thousands of opinions issued by Colorado and federal appellate courts on search and seizure issues analyzing many different search and seizure issues. Some of the more common search and seizure issues in a drug case might include:
· Whether an affidavit in support of a search warrant was lawfully executed;
· Whether police deviated from the scope of a search authorized in a search warrant;
· Whether a traffic stop was conducted lawfully;
· Whether consent for a search was obtained;
· Whether police deviated from the scope of consent obtained;
· Whether a search of a cell phone was conducted lawfully;
· Whether a GPS unit attached to a car was attached lawfully;
· Whether a wiretap was conducted lawfully.
Mr. Merson has conducted thousands of suppression hearings and litigated these issues many different times. He has also written appeals concerning suppression issues on several different occasions. Do not go into the courtroom on a drug case without an advocate that understands the importance of litigating suppression issues.